Prevalence and incidence of myopia and high myopia

Various high-percentage high-incidence medical conditions, acute or chronic, start at a particular age of onset t1 [yrs.], accumulate or progress rapidly, with a system time constant t0 [yrs.], typically from one week to five years, and then level off at a saturation plateau level <S>, ultimately affecting ten to ninety-five percent of the population. This report investigates the prevalence and incidence functions for myopia and high myopia as a function of age. This is a retrospective study. Fundamental prevalence vs. time and incidence vs. time results allow continuous prediction of myopia and high myopia population fractions as a function of age. Nine reports are calculated with N = 444,600 subjects, from S. E. Asia. No interventions other than usual regular eye exams, and subsequent indicated refraction change. The main result is continuous prediction of myopia prevalence-time data along with incidence rate data [% / year], age of onset [years], system plateau level, and system time constant [yrs.]. These parameters apply to progressive myopia and high myopia ( R < 6 D ), useful over several decades. The primary finding of this research is that the prevalence ratio of high-myopes (R < -6.0 D) to common-myopes is expected to increase from 25% entering college, to 50% or more after college. These statistics are particularly relevant to the many years of study required by M.D., Ph.D., and M.D. / Ph.D. programs. Nomenclature Pr(t) = myopia prevalence fraction as a function of time [%] In(t) = myopia incidence rate as a function of time [% / year] t0 = myopia time constant [years] t1 = myopia onset age [years] t2 = onset age [years] for advanced myopia <S> = saturation plateau level [%], 30% 95% for myopia 95% CI = 95% conf. interval, r = correl. coefficient <std.err.> = r.m.s. error @ regression line, typically +/2% Introduction The myopia prevalence fraction Pr(t) [%] versus time and the myopia incidence rate In(t) [%/yr] versus time are fundamental mathematically coupled functions, basic to the understanding of progressive myopia [1-5]. In general, medical conditions may be communicable or noncontagious, endemic or epidemic, inherited or acquired. The incidence rate function In(t) [%/yr.] is often mis-understood for myopia, a typical incidence rate of 16% percent per year, means one can expect sixteen new myopes each year, from each class of one-hundred students, at that age bracket. Practical ophthalmic examples of prevalence and incidence equations include retinopathy of prematurity ( R.O.P.), juvenile onset myopia, with onset age ranging from t1 = 0 to 12 yrs., adult onset glaucoma [6] with onset age t1 = 30 years, macular degeneration, cataract development, and presbyopia, with onset around age 40. Population demographic and epidemiologic surveys often include prevalence measurements, but not incidence data, incidence but not prevalence data, or prevalence without age-specific data. A system time constant t0 [yrs.] is rarely cited. In this report, we relate these fundamental parameters with basic equations, as applied to the Correspondence to: Peter R Greene, BGKT Consulting Ltd., Bioengineering, Huntington 11743, New York, USA, Tel: +1-631-935-56-66; E-mail: prgreenBGKT@gmail.com

In general, medical conditions may be communicable or noncontagious, endemic or epidemic, inherited or acquired. The incidence rate function In(t) [%/yr.] is often mis-understood -for myopia, a typical incidence rate of 16% percent per year, means one can expect sixteen new myopes each year, from each class of one-hundred students, at that age bracket. Practical ophthalmic examples of prevalence and incidence equations include retinopathy of prematurity ( R.O.P.), juvenile onset myopia, with onset age ranging from t1 = 0 to 12 yrs., adult onset glaucoma [6] with onset age t1 = 30 years, macular degeneration, cataract development, and presbyopia, with onset around age 40.

Usually, incidence data In(t) [%/yr] and prevalence Pr(t) [%]
are not available simultaneously. Similar equations for prevalence as a function of time or age Pr(t) are derived by Brinks & Landwehr (2013. Basic exponential equations for prevalence Pr(t) and incidence In(t) yield four key system parameters: onset age t1 [yr], time constant t0 [yr], saturation plateau level <S> [%], and initial incidence rate In(t1) [%/yr]. These then, in turn, allow direct comparisons between one data set and another, both cross-sectional and longitudinal.

Materials and methods
Basic equations: Myopia prevalence as a function of time is modeled with the following exponential equation [4]: The derivative d [Pr ( t )] / dt is given by where t0 [yrs.] is the system time constant, t1 [yrs.] is the onset age, and <S> = 0.90 is the saturation plateau level. For myopia, the saturation plateau level <S> = 0.90 indicates that by age 25 to 30 years old, 90% percent of these populations will develop myopia. The general format for the exponential prevalence equation, with saturation plateau <S> is:

Results
Statistics: Least squares regression calculates an average incidence rate In(t) = 4.7 % per year. Confidence limits on the incidence rate are In = [95% CI: 2.1 to 7.3 %/yr] (Figure 1). This means one can expect 2.1 to 7.3 new cases of myopia per year, on average, from each class of 100 at the same education level, Figures 2 and 3. The exponential equations predict much higher initial incidence rates In(t1), i.e. 15% to 20% per year, consistent with the incidence rate data, as shown in Figures 2 and 3. Table 1 displays the exponential prevalence function Pr(t) and incidence function In ( Theoretical results: Myopia incidence rates [%/yr] are 5 to 10 times more rapid, during the juvenile and teen years, compared to the college and university years. Figure 1 presents prevalence as a function of years of education Pr(t), using the data from [10], and theory from Eq. (1). Figure 2 shows incidence as a function of time In(t), using data from [10], and theory from Eq. (2).
For comparison with the exponential model, Figure 3 displays least squares regression statistics, yielding the following: Eq. (1) and (2) are derived setting the number of new incident subjects proportional to the residual fraction of normal subjects, yielding : From this, the inverse relation between incidence and time constant    also can be derived:

In ( t1 ) = < S > / t0 (5)
An important sub-group, accounting ultimately for ½ the total, the advanced myopes are presented in Figure 1 Table I

Discussion
Applications: Basic exponential equations presented here can continuously predict the prevalence Pr(t) [%] and incidence rate In(t) [%/yr] functions for myopia development. Symmetrically, the incidence function is derived from the prevalence function, the prevalence is the integral of the incidence. Thus, these are coupled equations. The initial incidence rate is inversely related to the system time constant, Eq. 5. For instance, an initial incidence In(t1) = 33 new cases per year, per 100, implies a time constant t0 = 3 yrs. for a plateau level of <S> = 1. For the analysis of myopia development, the time constant is t0 = 4.5 years, which is comparable to the individual myopia time constant 3 < t0 < 5 years, as reported by Medina & Fariza [12].
Least squares regression, while useful for prevalence data, Eq. 3 and Figure 3, considerably underestimates the incidence rate. Nevertheless, this approximation is reasonable, at a constant incidence level <In> = 4.7 %/yr. [95%CI: 2.1 to 7.3 %/yr.]. By comparison, the exponential equations are quite accurate, able to predict the incidence rate data within +/-2.6 %/yr, over the entire age range, Figure 2.

Conclusions
In this report we investigate the two simplest mathematical models available for prevalence and incidence, linear regression and exponential regression. Each may be applied to ophthalmic prevalence and incidence studies, allowing modeling of progressive myopia, glaucoma, presbyopia, and cataract, each with a specific onset age range and system time constant. These equations are accurate over the course of 2 to 3 decades.
For myopia, onset age, time constant, and saturation plateau level are fundamental system parameters derived from age specific prevalence data. In turn, these characteristic system parameters may be compared with the results of future myopia intervention studies.
High Myopia: Ordinary uncomplicated myopia (R > -6 D) is quite common, not considered a disease, per se. However, high myopia ( R < -6 D ) can result in some serious problems, that may lead to detrimental ramifications, involving the retina, choroid, sclera, vitreous and lens. The prevalence fraction Pr(t) [%] and incidence rates In(t) [%/ year] of high myopia are therefore important to examine separately. Mathematically, the high myopia prevalence fraction is a matter of a delayed onset t2 of 9 -12 years after t1, and a reduced saturation plateau level 50%, Greene & Medina [21], Eq. (6) graphed in Figure 1.

Summary
The primary finding of the research presented here is that the prevalence ratio of high-myopes (R < -6.0 D) to common-myopes is expected to increase from 25% entering college, to 50% or more after college, Figure 1