Follow us on :



Take a look at the Recent articles

Treating male breast cancer: Role of Oncotype Dx in early stage male breast cancer patients. A case series and review of literature

Wajeeha Razaq

Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, USA

E-mail : Wajeeha-razaq@ouhsc.edu

Takemi Tanaka

Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, USA

Mohammad A. Razaq

Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, USA

DOI: 10.15761/CCRR.1000201

Article
Article Info
Author Info
Figures & Data

Introduction

Male breast cancer is rare, and reportedly accounts for less than 1% of all breast cancers [1]. But the incidence is increasing with a mortality rate comparable to female breast cancer [2]. Although the histology is similar as female breast cancer, but emerging research points at the unique molecular profile associated with male breast cancer [3]. Most of the data on male breast cancer comes from small-single institution studies so assessment and treatment relies on experiences and guidelines that have been developed for female patients. It is estimated that about 2,140 new cases are diagnosed annually in the United States (US) and about 300 in the United Kingdom (UK). The number of annual deaths in the US is about 450 [4,5]. The relative risk of breast cancer for a female with an affected brother is approximately 30% higher than for a female with an affected sister [6]. The highest risk for male breast cancer is carried by men with Klinefelter syndrome [6]. Male BRCA mutation carriers are thought to be at higher risk for breast cancer as well, with roughly 10% of male breast cancer cases carrying BRCA2 mutations, and BRCA1 mutation being in the minority [7].

 Treatment largely follows patterns that have been set for the management of postmenopausal breast cancer. The initial treatment is surgical followed by adjuvant care with chemo/ hormonal or radiation therapy. The decision to use adjuvant chemotherapy in male patients with early stage breast cancer involves the consideration of many factors that traditionally rely heavily on tumor size and lymph node involvement and a limited set of biologic characteristics such as estrogen receptor and HER2 expression. Overtreatment with cytotoxic chemotherapy is a significant concern among patients and physicians.

Gene expression profiling is a technology developed to help improve risk stratification of patients and to predict outcomes. The Oncotype DX trade mark assay is one example of a gene expression profile validated in women with lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-expressing breast cancer. Patients with a low recurrence score may be able to receive only hormone therapy and avoid chemotherapy. The test measures multiple genes at once to estimate the risk of breast cancer recurrence. Oncotype DX is an assay performed on RNA extracted from paraffin-embedded tumor tissue. The test analyzes the expression of 21 genes: 16 are cancer-related genes and 5 are reference genes.

As the treatment strategy in male breast cancer patients follows the guidelines for postmenopausal women, using Oncotype DX in early stage, node negative, breast cancer patients makes sense. However there are no validation studies in this cohort.  This case series and review of literature will help us identifying the role Oncotype DX in male breast cancer patients.

 

Case series

 

Patient 1

66 year old male presented with a palpable left sub-areolar breast mass and nipple inversion and underwent left sided mastectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND). He was found to have Stage IIa, T2N0M0 Invasive ductal carcinoma of left breast, ER-98%, PR-80%, Her-2 – non amplified by FISH and Ki-67-10%.  Oncotype DX was requested and it showed a recurrence score (RS) of 24. After a detailed discussion, he was offered hormonal therapy with Letrozole as he had many co morbid conditions and was at higher risk of thrombosis.

 

Patient 2

 35 year old otherwise healthy male presented with palpable mass in his right breast and underwent bilateral mastectomies with right sided SLND. He was staged as Stage I T1bN0M0 Invasive ductal carcinoma of right breast. Tumor profile showed ER 100%, PR 10%, HER2 1+, Ki-67 10%. The Oncotype DX revealed a RS of 17. Patient was started on hormonal therapy with Tamoxifen for 5 years.

 

Patient 3

Our last patient was a 50 year old otherwise healthy male who also was diagnosed after a palpable with Stage IIA T2N0M0, Invasive ductal carcinoma of left breast. Pt had a left mastectomy with sentinel lymph node dissection. Tumor profile shows ER 100%, PR 45%, HER 2 was equivocal, Ki-67 95%. Oncotype Dx RS was high risk at 47. Repeat IHC of specimen confirmed HER2 to be 3+. Pt received adjuvant chemotherapy with Taxotere/Carboplatin/Herceptin for 6 cycles and Herceptin for a total of 1 year. He also received Tamoxifen after chemotherapy.

 

Discussion

Oncotype DX represents a step further in individualized care for patients with cancer. The ultimate goal of individualized care is that all patients can achieve optimal benefit from treatment and delivery of unnecessary therapy is minimized. Using a prospectively defined gene-expression assay and an algorithm for calculating recurrence scores, it was possible to quantify the likelihood of distant recurrence in patients with node-negative, estrogen-receptor–positive breast cancer [8,9].

Breast cancer is not just women’s disease, yet treatment for men is typically extrapolated from our experience in the female population since it is rare and there is little known about the biology of male breast cancer. Oncotype became available in 2004 for early stage breast cancer after it was validated in several retrospective studies. The Recurrence Score (RS) generated by the assay has proved to be a prognostic and predictive marker for patients with hormone receptor positive node negative breast cancer providing information beyond that provided by traditional prognostic marker.

There is not much literature available but we were able to find two studies. First one was presented in ASCO 2009 as a poster by Genomic Health. This was the first large genomic study focusing on male breast cancer. The study analyzed 347 male breast cancer samples and over 82,000 female breast cancer samples using Oncotype assay. A wide inter-patients variation was observed in gene expression in male breast cancer. They reported 53.6% low risk tumors based on RS score in males and 53.4% in females. Intermediate risk 35.2% in males vs 36.3% in females, and high risk 11.2% in males and 10.3% in females. They demonstrated male breast cancer displays the similar gene signatures to female breast cancer [10].

Although there were many similarities between the two patient groups but there were some differences too. Male breast cancer patients had higher mean expression of the hormone receptor genes, likely due to the different hormonal context of men and women. Male breast cancer patients were older than the females. And lastly, they were less likely to have the lobular form of breast cancer.

The other study was reported in 2014 and included 65 male patients and compared there RS score with 2,455 female patients. Mean reported age was 65 years. 44.6% male breast cancer patients had low risk, 41.5% intermediate risk, and 13.9% had high risk disease. They also noticed the same distribution of genomic expression as 2,455 female breast cancers [11].

Few case reports were also found where Oncotype was used as a decision making tool and overtreatment was avoided in male breast cancer patients [12,13].

 

Conclusion

The distribution of Recurrence Score in male breast cancer may be similar to female breast cancer. For this reason, Oncotype Dx may be a considerably good tool to be used to determine therapeutic strategy in a similar manner in male breast cancer patients as it is used in female breast cancer patients to evaluate the possible benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy and to avoid chemotherapy toxicity in over treatment of patients.

 

 

References

 

  1. Weiss JR, Moysich KB, Swede H (2005) Epidemiology of male breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14: 20-26. [Crossref]
  2. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, Ghafoor A, Samuels A, et al. (2004) Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin 54: 8-29. [Crossref]
  3. Pinto R, Pilato B, Ottini L, Lambo R, Simone G, et al. (2013) Different methylation and microRNA expression pattern in male and female familial breast cancer. J Cell Physiol 228: 1264-1269. [Crossref]
  4. "Breast Cancer in Men". American Cancer Society. February 9, 2011. Retrieved 2011-04-24.
  5. "Breast Cancer in Men". Cancer Research UK. 2007. Retrieved 2010-05-14.
  6. Gómez-Raposo C, Zambrana Tévar F, Sereno Moyano M, López Gómez M, Casado E (2010) Male breast cancer. Cancer Treat Rev 36: 451-457. [Crossref]
  7. Mohamad HB, Apffelstaedt JP (2008) Counseling for male BRCA mutation carriers: a review. Breast 17: 441-450. [Crossref]
  8. Conlin AK, Seidman AD (2007) Use of the Oncotype DX 21-gene assay to guide adjuvant decision making in early-stage breast cancer. Mol Diagn Ther 11: 355-360. [Crossref]
  9. Dobbe E, Gurney K, Kiekow S, Lafferty JS, Kolesar JM (2008) Gene-expression assays: new tools to individualize treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Am J Health Syst Pharm 65: 23-8. [Crossref]
  10. Hoeg RT, Lee JA, Mathiason MA, Rokkones K, Serck SL, et al. (2009) Publication outcomes of phase II oncology clinical trials. Am J Clin Oncol 32: 253-257. [Crossref]
  11. Grenader T, Yerushalmi R, Tokar M, Fried G, Kaufman B, et al. (2014) The 21-gene recurrence score assay (Oncotype DXâ„¢) in estrogen receptor-positive male breast cancer: experience in an Israeli cohort.  Oncology 87: 1-6. [Crossref]
  12. Yokoyama J, Kobayashi T, Nakamura T, Nakajima Y (2012) A case of male breast cancer in which oncotype DX was used to determine the therapeutic strategy. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 39: 2057-9. [Crossref]
  13. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, et al. (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351: 2817-2826. [Crossref]

 

Editorial Information

Editor-in-Chief

Andy Goren
University of Rome "G.Marconi"

Article Type

Review Article

Publication history

Received date: December 14, 2015
Accepted date: January 11, 2016
Published date: January 15, 2016

Copyright

©2016 Rix G. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

Rix G (2016) Lumenis.LTD Pulse 100H Holmium Laser – an early assessment. Clin Case Rep Rev 1: doi: 10.15761/CCRR.1000201

Corresponding author

Vaughan Daniels – Hepnar

Global HoLEP Training Manager, Lumenis Ltd. Yokneam, Israel, Tel: +972.4.9599032, +1 954 439 8764.

E-mail : Daniels.Vaughan@lumenis.com

Table 1. Patient characteristics

AGE

Race

Path

ER

PR

Her-2

Ki-67

Surgery

Oncotype

(RS)

Stage

66

Caucasian

IDC

98%

80%

Negative

10%

mastectomy

24

T2N0M0

35

Caucasian

IDC

100%

10%

Negative

10%

B/L mastectomies

17

T1bN0 M0

50

Caucasian

IDC

100%

45%

Positive

95%

Mastectomy

47

T2N0M0