Take a look at the Recent articles

Efficacy of Transumbilical single incision-Laparoscopic-assisted surgery in pediatric patients

Soo-Min Jung

Department of Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Konkuk University, School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

E-mail : aa

DOI: 10.15761/TiM.1000127

Article
Article Info
Author Info
Figures & Data

Abstract

Backgrounds: Due to advancement in minimally invasive surgery, the boundary of single incision laparoscopic surgery is extended to pediatric patients. We investigated the usefulness of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic- assisted surgery based on our recent experiences.

Methods: We retrospectively collected the data of 82 patients who underwent transumbilical single incision laparoscopic- assisted surgery from May 2013 to January 2016.

Results: During the study period, 82 children underwent surgery. 72(87.8%) patients underwent appendectomy with TSI and the remaining 10 patients underwent transumbilical single incision laparoscopic- assisted surgery for various surgical abdominal conditions such as intussusception, Meckel’s diverticulum, small bowel mass, mesenteric lymphangioma, adhesive ileus, and the like. The Extracorporeal procedure was performed alongside with laparoscopy for sophisticated manipulation. Mean operation time was 40±20 minutes in appendicitis while other operations were held for 30 to 80 minutes.The reduction of intussusception can be done easily and take a short operation time with transumbilical single incision laparoscopic- assisted surgery. Median hospital days was 3 days (2~7 days) in appendicitis while others stayed for 3 to 9 days. There was no surgical complication during admission. Three patients underwent appendectomy had umbilical stitch abscess a month later which resolved after removing the stitch.

Conclusion: We consider with transumbilical single incision laparoscopic- assisted surgery as a safe procedure in pediatric patients. And the umbilical window makes surgery easier. Even in challenging cases, exposure of the lesion through the umbilical port helps to avoid conversion to laparotomy.

Keywords

minimally invasive surgery, pediatric, laparoscopy, appendectomy, intussusception

Introduction

The innovation in minimally invasive surgeries, especially laparoscopy, has changed the paradigm of surgery. Since Pelosi, et al. first introduced single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy, single port surgery has been amended to many fields of surgery[1]. However, the limited space inside the abdomen of pediatric patients makes it difficult to perform the procedure, resulting in a delay of utilizing single port surgery. Nonetheless, some investigators reported performing transumbilical laparoscopic assisted appendectomy, using the umbilical port for extracorporeal procedure Yury Kozlov, et al. reviewed the indications for single-incision endoscopic surgery (SIPES) in neonates and children under 12 months of age [2]. However, in the pediatric surgical field, there are not many reports of extracorporeal procedures through the single incision navel window in other surgical procedures, besides appendectomy. As reported by previous investigators, the author initiated single incision endoscopic surgery for appendectomy; most of the cases with single incision surgery are solely appendectomy. Since the umbilical port site can be utilized as an open window to perform extracorporeal procedures, surgeries other than appendectomy are easier, compared to conventional multi-port laparoscopic surgery. This paper describes the experience of one pediatric surgeon, and discusses the efficacy of this procedure.

Materials and methods

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (#2016-05-031).It included 82 pediatric patients who underwent transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery between May 2013 to January 2016, performed by a single pediatric surgeon. The age of the patient, diagnosis, hospitalization period, operation time, and postoperative complications were retrospectively reviewed. The surgical procedure was as follows: a median or S-shape incision with a length of 1.5~2cm was made on the umbilicus (Figure 1A). Through the incision, Glove portTM with a detachable cap was inserted (Figure 1B) A 5mm camera and two 3mm instruments were inserted through the port, and a 5mm instrument and a 5mm harmonic scalpel were used as energy devices, if required (Figure 1C). Occasionally, the cap of the Glove portTM was detached and extracorporeal manual procedure was performed through the port site. For example, intracorporeal laparoscopic appendicular artery ligation and appendix base ligation were performed for appendectomy, and the appendix was removed via the navel window following excision. During transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery, the extracorporeal procedure was performed through the umbilical port after the laparoscopic procedure, only when necessary. After completion of the manual procedure outside the abdomen, the small bowel was replaced within the abdominal cavity, following which the operation was concluded

Figure 1.A) Incision site and shape, B) Cap-detachable Glove portTM, C) Glove port inserted through the umbilicus, and the appearance of the umbilicus

Results

The demographic features and diagnoses of the 82 patients are summarized in Table 1. The median age of the patients was 8.9 years, ranging from 4.3 months to 16.7 years. Seventy-two (87.8%) patients underwent transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery for acute appendicitis (simple or micro perforation), which was the most common disorder. On the computed tomography, 1 patient was diagnosed with an incidental mass in the small bowel which was taken as a diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The patient underwent transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assistedappendectomy, following which the terminal ileum was delivered through the umbilical port site and proximal bowel was traced manually. A 1 cm sized mass was found in the jejunum, and small bowel resection and anastomosis were performed extracorporeally. Pathology confirmed the mass as an ectopic pancreas. Transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery was performed on 6 patients with intussusception. The first patient had ileo-ileal intussusception as a complication of Henoch-schonlein purpura. Ultrasonography revealed the intussusception was present in a long segment, and the patient was expected to have severe bowel congestion. We performed a laparoscopic exploration to find the location of the lesion and went through transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery to perform minimally invasive surgery. Exploration revealed the intussusception in the distal ileum, and we attempted intracorporeal laparoscopic reduction, but failed (Figure 2A). Therefore, a manual reduction was performed by pulling the proximal bowel via the navel window (Figure 2B). Although severe congestion of the small bowel was observed, there was no necrosis in the bowel. After replacing the bowel in the abdominal cavity, the surgery was completed (Figure 2C). The patient started a diet on the 3rdpostoperative day, and also started treatment for Henoch-schonlein purpura. The patient was discharged on the 9th postoperative day with no further postoperative complications. Reduction of the other 5 ileocecal intussusceptions without leading points was very easy with transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgeries with mean operation time 40 ± 10 minutes. In another case, a female patient aged 4.7 months had massive hematochezia and underwent a Meckel scan, which revealed a suspected lesion. Laparoscopic exploration was performed by transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery, and we discovered a 1cm sized whitish, solid mass on the mesenteric border of a small bowel. Extracorporeal small bowel resection and anastomosis were performed through the port site. The lesion was confirmed to be a heterotrophic gastric mucosa (Figure 3). An intracorporeal band lysis was performed in 1 patient who was detected with an adhesion band that was suspected to occur after a traffic accident which resulted in partial bowel obstruction. The median age of patients who underwent appendectomy (72 patients) was 108 months (range: 32 months to 201 months) and mean operation time for the procedure was 40±20 minutes in appendectomy, whereas other surgeries ranged from 30 to 80 minutes (Table 2). The median length of hospital stay was 3 days (2 to 7 days) in appendectomy, and for other patients it ranged from 3 to 9 days. The patient discharged on the 9th postoperative day had to stay longer because of the treatment for Henoch-schonlein purpura (Table 3). There were no immediate postoperative complications related to transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery. There were 3 cases with a stitch abscess which occurred about a month after the operation in appendectomy patients, and they were resolved after removing the stitch. Another patient visited complaining of an umbilical pain which spontaneously resolved with no other intervention. Umbilical scars were aesthetically superb (Figure 4).

Table 1. Patients Demographics (n=82)

Characteristics

Value

Age(median, range)

8.9yrs, 4.3m~16.7yrs

Diagnosis

No.

Acute appendicitis

72(1 ectopic pancreas)

Intussusception

6(5 ileo-colic,1 ileo-ileal:HSP*)

Heterotrophic gastric mucosa

1

Meckel’s diverticulum c ectopic pancreas

1

Intestinal obstruction

1(post-traumatic adhesion)

Intestinal bleeding

1(transverse colon ulceration)

HSP: Henoch-schonleing purpura

Table 2.Transumbilcal single incision laparoscopic assisted surgery (n=82)

Diagnosis (n)

OP name

Op time (min)

Acute appendicitis (72)

Appendectomy

40±20

Incidental small bowel resection                         

70

Intussusception (6)

Manual reduction c pulling method

40±10

Heterotrophic gastric mucosa (1)

Small bowel resection & anastomosis

60

Meckel’s diverticulum and ectopic pancreas (1)

Small bowel resection & anastomosis

70

Intestinal obstruction (1)

Adhesiolysis

50

Intestinal bleeding (1)

Exploration and adhesiolysis

80

Table 3. Length of hospital stay

Diagnosis (n)

Hospital days

Median    

range

Acute appendicitis(72)

3

2~7

Intussusception(2)

7

3~9

Heterotrophic gastric mucosa(1)

5

 

Meckel’s diverticulumandectopic pancreas (1)

5

 

Intestinal obstruction(1)

5

 

Intestinal bleeding(1)

8

 

Figure 2.A) Ileo-ileal intussusception, B) Extracorporeal manual reduction, C) The appearance of the ileum that was returned to the abdomen after reduction

Figure 3.Heterotropic gastric mucosa in 4.7 months female patient

Figure 4. Postoperative umbilical scar

Discussion

Due to the advancement of minimally invasive surgery, operative techniques are developing rapidly. The author always judges if the patient can be operated with minimally invasive surgery. In certain situations, minimally invasive surgery offers a better visualization than laparotomy. The benefit of minimally invasive surgery is accepted worldwide by surgeons, and numerous literature on laparoscopy and robot-assisted surgery has been published. Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric surgery was first introduced in the late 1990s[3,4]. Recently, a literature reporting bowel resection with a laparoscopic assisted transumbilical single incision port in a pediatric patient with Crohn’s disease was published. Also published is a study comparing transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy (TULA) and single incision laparoscopic appendectomy[5,6]. In 2015, Yuri, et al. reported reviewing single incision surgery in a pediatricpatient and proposed the nomenclature ‘single incision pediatric endosurgery’ (SIPES). In the literature, they reported SIPES applied to neonates and patients under 12 months of age [2,7-9]. Numerous studies have address the feasibility of single incisions. As we noted, literature regarding the so called ‘Hybrid operation’ has also been introduced[10-12]. Technically, there are some differences between when the transumbilical port is used only for laparoscopic procedure, and when the port is used for the extracorporeal procedure. Especially in intussusception, transumbilical single incision surgery was much more convenient than multi-port conventional laparoscopy. Conventional laparoscopic surgery to reduce intussusception is not easy. Surgery that pulls the congested intestine with the laparoscopic instrument is not only difficult because of the serosa tearing, but also requires an operation time of an hour or more to enable the intestine to return to its original position. However, by pulling out the proximal bowel through the umbilical window of the single port by hand, the reduction is completed very quickly. Even when the congestion is very severe, it usually does not exceed 30 minutes. Of the patients not included in this study period, 2 were not reduced by this method. Therefore, the open conversion was performed, and the duplication cysts were confirmed as the leading point in these 2 patients. In this method, the operation time for reduction of intussusception is faster than the conventional laparotomy; we recently performed the pulling method with transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery in intussusception patients who are unsuccessful in air reduction. The limited intra-abdominal space in pediatric patients can be advantageous for utilizing the umbilical port that helps to reach more extensively than adult patients. That is why all single incision surgeries should be based on the hybrid operation. This assumption can also be altered for adult patients, especially in small bowel lesions like Meckel’s diverticulum.Despite the fact that the concept of single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery is not new, it is not widely applied in the field of pediatric surgery. Therefore, here we introduce our experience of transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery, which we consider to be superior to either laparotomy or conventional laparoscopy. The strength of this study is that we adjusted the transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery in intussusception. Although there were only 6 patients during the study period, the pulling methods with transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery were very easy and comfortable. In order to confirm this procedure, more research is required on a larger number of patients.In conclusion, transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery was applicable to appendectomy as well as various other surgical abdomen diseases in children. In particular, transumbilical single incision laparoscopic-assisted surgery may be a substitute for laparotomy in children who are suspected to require manipulation of the small bowel.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ?Pelosi MA, Pelosi MA, (1992) Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single umbilical puncture (minilaparoscopy). J Reprod Med 37:588-594.
  2. Kozlov Y, Novozhilov V, Baradieva P, Krasnov P, Kovalkov K, et al. (2015) Single-incision pediatricendosurgery in newborns and infants. World J ClinPediatr 4:55-65.
  3. Esposito C(1998) One-trocar appendectomy in pediatric surgery. SurgEndosc 12: 177-178.[Crossref] 
  4. Valla J, Ordorica-Flores RM, Steyaert H, Merrot T, Bartels A, et al. (1999) Umbilical one-puncture laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children. SurgEndosc13:83-85.
  5. Boo YJ, Lee Y, Lee JS(2016) Comparison of transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy versus single incision laparoscopic appendectomy in children: which is the better surgical option? J PediatrSurg 51: 1288-1291.[Crossref] 
  6. Huntington JT, Boomer LA, Pepper VK, Diefenbach KA, Dotson JL, et al. (2016) Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for children with Crohn's disease. PediatrSurgInt 32:459-464.
  7. Takehara H, Yakabe S, Kameoka K (2006) Laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure for inguinal hernia in children: clinical outcome of 972 repairs done in 3 pediatric surgical institutions. J PediatrSurg41:1999-2003.
  8. Muensterer OJ, Chong AJ, Georgeson KE, Harmon CM (2011) The Cross-technique for single-incision pediatricendosurgical pyloromyotomy. SurgEndosc 25:3414-3418.
  9. Clark JM, Koontz CS, Smith LA, Kelley JE (2008) Video-assisted transumbilical Meckel's diverticulectomy in children. Am Surg 74: 327-329.[Crossref] 
  10. Potter DD, Tung J, Faubion WA, Jr, Moir C (2012) Single-incision laparoscopic colon and rectal surgery for pediatric inflammatory bowel disease and polyposis syndromes. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 22:203-207.
  11. Muensterer OJ, Keijzer R (2011) Single-incision pediatricendosurgery-assisted ileocecectomy for resection of a NEC stricture. PediatrSurgInt 27:1351-1353.
  12. Hansen EN, Muenster2021 Copyright OAT. All rights reserv Single-incision pediatricendosurgery: lessons learned from our first 224 laparoendoscopic single-site procedures in children. PediatrSurgInt 27:643-648.

Editorial Information

Editor-in-Chief

Ying-FuChen
Kaohsiung Medical University

Article Type

Research Article

Publication history

Received date: January 12, 2018
Accepted date: February 05, 2018
Published date: February09, 2018

Copyright

©2018 Soo-Min J. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricteduse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

Soo-Min J (2018) Efficacy of Transumbilical single incision-Laparoscopic-assisted surgery in pediatric patients. Trends Med 18: doi:10.15761/TiM.1000127

Corresponding author

Soo-Min Jung, MD

Department of Surgery, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul,05030, Korea, Tel: 82220307894, Fax: 82220307346

Table 1. Patients Demographics (n=82)

Characteristics

Value

Age(median, range)

8.9yrs, 4.3m~16.7yrs

Diagnosis

No.

Acute appendicitis

72(1 ectopic pancreas)

Intussusception

6(5 ileo-colic,1 ileo-ileal:HSP*)

Heterotrophic gastric mucosa

1

Meckel’s diverticulum c ectopic pancreas

1

Intestinal obstruction

1(post-traumatic adhesion)

Intestinal bleeding

1(transverse colon ulceration)

HSP: Henoch-schonleing purpura

Table 2.Transumbilcal single incision laparoscopic assisted surgery (n=82)

Diagnosis (n)

OP name

Op time (min)

Acute appendicitis (72)

Appendectomy

40±20

Incidental small bowel resection                         

70

Intussusception (6)

Manual reduction c pulling method

40±10

Heterotrophic gastric mucosa (1)

Small bowel resection & anastomosis

60

Meckel’s diverticulum and ectopic pancreas (1)

Small bowel resection & anastomosis

70

Intestinal obstruction (1)

Adhesiolysis

50

Intestinal bleeding (1)

Exploration and adhesiolysis

80

Table 3. Length of hospital stay

Diagnosis (n)

Hospital days

Median    

range

Acute appendicitis(72)

3

2~7

Intussusception(2)

7

3~9

Heterotrophic gastric mucosa(1)

5

 

Meckel’s diverticulumandectopic pancreas (1)

5

 

Intestinal obstruction(1)

5

 

Intestinal bleeding(1)

8

 

Figure 1.A) Incision site and shape, B) Cap-detachable Glove portTM, C) Glove port inserted through the umbilicus, and the appearance of the umbilicus

Figure 2.A) Ileo-ileal intussusception, B) Extracorporeal manual reduction, C) The appearance of the ileum that was returned to the abdomen after reduction

Figure 3.Heterotropic gastric mucosa in 4.7 months female patient

Figure 4. Postoperative umbilical scar