Take a look at the Recent articles

Giant Viruses

Clyde Schultz

Department of Biology University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

DOI: 10.15761/GIMCI.1000173.

Article
Article Info
Author Info
Figures & Data

Abstract

The discovery of what are referred to as Giant Viruses within the last few decades has become something of a phenomenon is biological circles. These viruses are found largely in the environment and are much larger in size and genomic complexity as compared to other viruses, rivaling bacteria in terms of composition. They are associated with amoebae and use amoebae as “factories” for replication. While they have not been directly linked to human disease, they have been isolated from human bodily fluids.

Keywords

virus; environment, genome, amoebae

Introduction

The isolation of a group of viruses known collectively as giant viruses of amoebae is relatively recent, and there is evidence of their existence going back at least 30,000 years [1,2]. There are several major groups of giant viruses that have been identified at this time. All are associated with amoebae. Among these are the groups are the Pithovirus, Mimivirus, Marseillevirus and Pandoravirus groups.

Giant viruses are extreme for many reasons [1,2]. First is their physical size which prevent them from passing through porcelain filters. Second is the size of their genomes which vary from 1.2 Mb for the mimivirus group to 2.5 Mb for the pandoravirus group [3]. Third, they are usually associated with amoebae. They use the amoebae for replication. In general, giant viruses reproduce in cytoplasmic compartments or “factories” which may be as a large in size as a nucleus. This is one of the ways in which all giant virus are similar, the replication cycle [4]. All have a phagocytic entry mechanism to a host cell, and all have DNA release and replication in these factories. They all possess double stranded DNA. However, the replication cycle varies somewhat relative to the time of replication, and in some respects the degree of organization.

Pithovirus was first described in 2014. As mentioned above it was first seen associated with an amoeba dating back 30,000 years [1,2]. It has an oval wall and is open at one end, with a complex honeycomb type internal structure. Pithovirus contains in excess of 450 genes. Pithovirus has a circular genome and like all giants is ds DNA. It has about 600,000 base pairs, which translate 460 different proteins [3]. This much DNA encodes all the proteins needed to produce mRNA. Pithovirus undergoes its entire replication cycle in the cytoplasm of the host cell, not in the nucleus which makes it different from other “small” virus. The replication cycle may last as long as 20 hours, and is similar to pandoravirus. Pithovirus sibericum was found associated with amoebae in the soil dating back to the late Stone Age [2]. It was unearthed during an uncharacteristic thaw in the region. This virus group is comparable in genomic size to some bacteria.

Giant Virus was first isolated in hospital associated with Acanthamoeba polyphaga (mimivirus) [3]. It was isolated in a patient which presented to hospital with a respiratory infection. Since that time the search for the giant virus has become of primarily importance to environmental microbiologists. Mimivirus was first discovered and identified as a giant virus in 2003 in France [4]. However, this agent was linked subsequently to a pneumonia outbreak in Leeds (UK) in 1992, for which a causative agent was not found at the time. Further examination revealed this as a giant virus which had an infected an amoeba [5,6]. This indicates that the virus has been active and yet not detected for at least some decades in this case. They have a capsid of 500 nm and 75 nm long fibrils. These fibrils allow for attachment via glycans onto different types of fungi and bacteria. The genes of Mimivirus were found to encode proteins responsible for DNA repair and protein folding and metabolism of polysaccharides and lipids [7].

As with other giant viruses Pandoravirus are not at this time known to infect humans [8]. In comparison to Pithovirus, the Pandoravirus has 5 times as many protein coding sequences. They are found in the environment have been associated with contact lens solutions via their amoebae hosts. They are found in marine environments and sediment. The replication cycle for this group starts with viral penetration through phagocytic vacuoles. Pandoravirus reorganizes the host nucleus as a precursor for replication, with new particles being released about 10 hours after infection.

Marseilleviruses was isolate in 2009 from a cooling tower France [9]. It is comprised of a 250 nm capsid and is icosahedral in shape. As with the other giant viruses this group is primarily isolated from the environment associated with an amoebae host. However, one member of this group the Senegalvirus was isolated directly from human feces from a healthy subject in Senegal.

Infections in Humans

Giant viruses unlike other human and animal viruses have shown no clear direct link directly to human infections. What seems to be necessary is a host vector such as an amoebae for replication. But there is no “downstream” infection. There is always the presence of the protist. Many of these infections are respiratory in nature. There are also reports of infections due to contamination of contact lens cases for storage of lenses and solutions, and intestinal infections. In the case of the contact lens contaminantion there was also isolation of Acanthamoeba. However, the data indicate that once infected there is evidence of an immune response to the virus involved. Often the giant virus group is the Mimivirus. It is possible that the cause of overt symptoms such as respiratory distress or other types of inflammation are due to the presence of the amoebae, as well as the virus. This possibility is somewhat frightening as amoebae are difficult to treat. At this time there are no vaccine therapy against any giant virus to say nothing of the amoeba which frequently act as hosts [10].

Conclusions

The recent discovery of giant viruses and their linkage to human disease represents an exciting possibility for a greater understanding of our world. They seem to be ubiquitous. They are found everywhere from forest, to the open oceans and more recently to humans. There is much that is not known. Can they cause disease on their own, or must they always be associated with amoebae? How expansive are they in nature and can they offer new opportunities for gene transfer and disease treatment because their genomes tend to be more complex that the “average” virus?

Frozen organisms like the giant viruses discussed above from the past may or may not in this instant case be a threat to humans in the present day. Science has no idea at this point what other ancient species of microbe exist that have yet to be unearthed due to climate change. What is certain is that these newly discovered organisms must be studied, and with the greatest of care.

Another issue that may be associated with giant virus is their potential use a biological weapon. Since the cells and the genomes contained there-in are large, like the pox virus, there may be opportunities for placement of human harmful genetic code inside these viruses themselves. There are of course several problems associated with this, not least of which is the large-scale manufacture of these viruses, there storage until use and stability upon genetic manipulation. But there is the possibility that if weaponized these organisms could represent a tremendous threat to human health.

References

  1. Greub G, Raoult D (2004) Microorganisms resistant to free living amoebae. Clin Micro Rev 17: 413-433.
  2. Legendre M, Bartoli J, Shmakova L, Jeudy S, Labadie K, et al. (2014) Thirty thousand year old distant relative of giant icosahedral DNA virus with a pandorvirus morphology. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111: 4274-4279. [Crossref]
  3. Raoult D, Audic S, Robert C, Abergel C, Renesto P, et al. (2004) The 1.2-megabase genome sequence of Mimivirus. Science 306: 1344-1350. [Crossref]
  4. Katzourakis A, Aswad AMR (2014) The origins of giant viruses, virophages, and their relatives in host genomes. BMC Biol 12: 51-55. [Crossref]
  5. Colson P, La Scola B, Raoult D (2013) Giant viruses of amoebae as potential human pathogens. Intravirology 56: 376-385. [Crossref]
  6. La Scola B, Audic S, Robert C, Jungang L, de Lamballerie X, et al. (2003) A giant virus of amoebae. Science 299: 2033-2037. [Crossref]
  7. Raoult D, La Scola B, Birtles R (2007) The discovery and characterization of Mimivirus, the largest known virus and putative pneumonia agent. Clin Infect Dis 45: 95-102. [Crossref]
  8. Philippe N, Legendre M, Doutre G, Couté Y, Poirot O, et al. (2013) Pandoravirus amoeba viruses with genome up to 2.5 mb reaching that of parasitic eukaryotes. Science 341: 281-286. [Crossref]
  9. Boyer M, Yutin N, Pagnier I, Barrassi L, Fournous G, et al. (2009) Giant Marseillevirus highlights the role of amoebae as a melting pot in emergence of chimeric microorganisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 21848-21853. [Crossref]
  10. Lagier JC, Armougom F, Million M, Hugon P, Pagnier I, et al. (2012) Microbial culturomics paradigm shift in the human gut microbiome study. Clin Microbiol Infect 18: 1185-1193. [Crossref]

Editorial Information

Editor-in-Chief

Dario Marchetti
Baylor College of Medicine

Article Type

Research Article

Publication history

Received date: January 23, 2019
Accepted date: February 11, 2019
Published date: February 14, 2019

Copyright

© 2019 Schultz C. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

Schultz C (2019) Giant Viruses. Gen Int Med Clin Innov 3: DOI: 10.15761/GIMCI.1000173.

Corresponding author

Schultz C

Department of Biology University of Calgary, 2500 University Drive, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

No Figures.