Take a look at the Recent articles

Limitations of elastography based prostate biopsy

Berat Cem Ozgur

Ankara Research and Training Hospital, Urology Clinic, Ankara, Turkey

Buğra Bilge Keseroğlu

Ankara Research and Training Hospital, Urology Clinic, Ankara, Turkey

DOI: 10.15761/TCRC.1000114.

Article
Article Info
Author Info
Figures & Data

Although many authors mentioned there is not a clear data about comparing elastography in larger vs smaller prostates, the literature is certain that, in the detection of especially anterior tumors MRI and perineal biopsy are superior to standart transrectal guided biopsies as these techniques provide better spectacle of this part of the prostate [1,2]. In our opinion enlarged prostate glands had an effect on the final results (probably decreased the low recorded sensitivity) because of the worse spectacle but no data was given about the prostate volumes in their study. On the other hand, pathologic confirmation was based on biopsy specimens. Emphasising radical prostatectomy specimen (at least for the patients who undergone to surgery after diagnosis) will be more appropriate for the correlation of imaging and pathology. The studies which represents single population from a single center might be a limitation. Lastly, viscosity of organs such as breast, thyroid, prostate etc. has to be clearly measured in order to avoid biases of stiffness as previously demonstrated [3].

In the last few years, research on elasticity imaging has gained importace because the viscoelastic properties of different tissues provided clinically useful information [4]. Beside prostate cancer, it is widely used in the diagnosisis of many different diseases like cancers of breast, liver and thyroid, cirrhosis, venous thrombosis arterial stiffness and plaques etc. in different clinics. Multicenter controlled trials are needed before falling elastography based biopsies into disfavour of prostate cancer detection since positive predictive values of PSA and DRE remains low and innovations like serum PCA3 or MRI targeted biopsies are expensive and time consuming protocols yet.

References

  1. Hoeks CM, Hambrock T, Yakar D, Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA, Feuth T, et al. (2013) Transition zone prostate cancer: detection and localization with 3-T multiparametricMR imaging. Radiology 266: 207-217.
  2. Pepe P, Dibenedetto G, Pennisi M, Fraggetta F, Colecchia M, et al. (2014) Detection rate of anterior prostate cancer in 226 patients submitted to initial and repeat transperineal biopsy. Urol Int 93: 189-192.
  3. Amador C, Urban MW, Chen S, Greenleaf JF (2011) Shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry (SDUV) on swine kidney. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 58: 2608-2619.
  4. Castaneda B, Ormachea J, Rodríguez P, Parker KJ (2013) Application of numerical methods to elasticity imaging. Molecular & Cellular Biomechanics: MCB 10: 43-65.

Editorial Information

Editor-in-Chief

Dr. Vita Golubovskaya
Promab Biotechnologies, USA

Article Type

Research Article

Publication history

Received date: November 27, 2018
Accepted date: February 28, 2019
Published date: March 05, 2019

Copyright

© 2019 Ozgur BC. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Citation

Ozgur BC, Keseroğlu BB (2019) Limitations of elastography based prostate biopsy. Trends Cancer Res Chemother 2: DOI: 10.15761/TCRC.1000114.

Corresponding author

Berat Cem Ozgur

Ankara Research and Training Hospital, Urology Clinic, Ankara, Turkey.

No Figures.